GreeneRadio.org

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Medical Marijuana Federal authorities nearing settlement with accused marijuana-grow operations supplier
first
  
last
 
 
start
stop

Federal authorities nearing settlement with accused marijuana-grow operations supplier

E-mail Print PDF

Federal authorities are close to resolving a years-long investigation into a Front Range hydroponics gardening store owner and a network of basement marijuana grows, according to court records.

Federal prosecutors accuse Corey Inniss, the owner of the Way to Grow chain of hydroponics stores, of supplying growing equipment from his stores to help set up several marijuana cultivation operations in homes from Boulder to Fort Collins.

In exchange for the equipment, Inniss received a cut of the operations' proceeds, according to the documents.

Prosecutors accuse Inniss of taking the money he received from the marijuana operation and depositing it into business accounts for his hydroponics stores.

The court documents state that, between April 2005 and August 2006, Inniss made nearly $1.3 million in cash deposits into two Way to Grow bank accounts.

Authorities launched the investigation in August 2006, and recent filings suggest that the case may soon be resolved.

"The parties continue to be engaged in settlement negotiations and believe that a settlement is eminent as part of a global resolution involving criminal charges as well," federal prosecutors wrote in a Dec. 3 status update filing in one of the forfeiture cases.

Both Jeff Dorschner, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's office in Denver, and Mike Turner, a Drug Enforcement Administration spokesman, declined to comment on the case.

Jeralyn Merritt, an attorney for Inniss, said in a statement: "Mr. Inniss, Way to Grow and the Government have expended considerable time and effort over the past year to resolve their legal differences. We anticipate a full resolution within the next few months. Way to Grow will continue to operate in full compliance with the law."

The investigation details appear in court documents in two asset forfeiture cases filed in federal District Court in Denver.

In the first case, federal prosecutors are seeking to seize five houses — one in Windsor, one in Erie and three in Fort Collins — where the growing operations are alleged to have been housed. In the second case, prosecutors are trying to seize $48,900 found at one of the houses.

In October 2009, federal agents raided nine houses connected with the case and seized 981 mature and starter marijuana plants, according to the documents.

The attorney for one of the alleged growers, Martin Pieper, asserted in one case filing that any cultivation at Pieper's house complied with Colorado's medical-marijuana laws.

Pieper's attorney, Joseph Saint-Veltri, declined to elaborate when reached by telephone.

 

Last Updated on Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:02  
first
  
last
 
 
start
stop

 

 

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Newsflash

Posted by CN Staff on September 28, 2010 at 06:40:04 PT
Editorial Opinion
Source: Los Angeles Daily News

California -- To truly consider the merits of Proposition 19, you must check your morals at the door. Because the heart of the Nov. 2 ballot measure is not about whether marijuana is no worse than alcohol or whether the law should allow for small amounts of personal pot.

The real question of this initiative is whether California wants to take on the federal government and allow any and every city in the state to make up its own rules about selling, manufacturing and transporting an illegal substance.

And the Daily News thinks the answer to the question is an emphatic "no."